Golden Plus One Anniversary! Celebrating My 51 years in Costa Mesa

It's been 51 years since my late husband John and I left Tucson and put down our roots in Costa Mesa, and I feel like celebrating! 

All things considered, it's been an exciting 51 years and looking back, I am very thankful that I didn't leave Costa Mesa, and I don't plan to leave in the future. It's a city where, although not perfect, middle-class families with children, singles, and seniors representing many cultures enjoy a wonderful quality of life.

I am still in love with Costa Mesa: its people, fresh Pacific Ocean breezes, (I never use air conditioning) our nature and playground parks, the multi-ethnic vibe, endless creativity...the fun just never ends!

So how did John and I find Costa Mesa? Or how did Costa Mesa find us?

In 1968 John enlisted in the Army Reserves during the Vietnam War and did his basic training at Ft. Knox. We were married in Tucson in 1969 at the end of my junior year at the University of Arizona. I graduated in 1970 with a BA in Education with an English major and journalism minor.

While I taught high school journalism and English for two years at Canyon del Oro High school, John completed his BS in architecture and graduated in 1972.

Immediately after John's graduation, we were ready to strike out on our own (and leave the heat for cool California). John landed a job with the famous America's Cup winner and local architect Bill Ficker, and we moved to an apartment in Westminster, and he started working at the very cool Ficker offices on the old Irvine Ranch on Bison. 

I was hired as a reporter, likely because of my very short 70's mini skirt, at the Santa Ana Register on Grand Ave. and reported on the City of Tustin affairs, its schools and city government and sometimes the Orange County Department of Education the OC Planning Commission. The newsroom was noisy with busy reporters typing on typewriters without spell check and using carbon copies.  There were no copying machines.

 COSTA MESA HERE WE COME!

A dear friend from junior high school lived in Huntington Beach at the corner of Hamilton and Brookhurst, so we were familiar with the Costa Mesa area when we started looking for a home to buy.

We drove west on Brookhurst and turned left on Victoria, driving up "the hill".  We spotted the "Open House" sign on Valley Circle, by the small shopping center. The lots were long and narrow and there it was: a cute 3-bedroom home for $24,500. 

The realtor told us that very soon, a "big marina" would be near our home, bringing the Pacific Ocean to the Marina Highlands bluffs just a block away. In those days, Costa Mesa's motto was "Hub of the Harbor."  It would be a great investment! We could add a second story someday and have an ocean view.  My smart, architect husband could design the second story!

Also, thinking ahead, Victoria School was just a block away so our (future) kids could walk to school. I was a product of Chicago area public schools and John went to public school in Tucson and we believed in public education.

We borrowed the down payment from John's folks, bought the house and moved into our "heaven on earth" in Costa Mesa.

Valley Circle, Costa Mesa, CA

Next:  The 70's.

Time to Open Council Chambers for Citizens

 The OC Board of Supervisors allows citizens to speak in person during public comments and public comments on agenda items.

So does the City of Newport Beach.

It's time for the Costa Mesa City Council to re open the Council Chambers so residents can once again attend meetings in person and comment on items of concern to us.

What is the delay?

We're willing to distance and wear masks if still required, although evidence is surfacing that masks are useless.

At the April 6 meeting I called during public comments via Zoom, which is confusing for many people, and asked to restore in person Council Meetings.

Crickets.

If people don't feel safe, they can still call in with comments.

We've spent a year stifled in many ways from giving our First Amendment comments to our elected City officials.  Freedom of speech, transparency, presenting our grievances--all curtailed by COVID.

Time to open!

If you agree, please send emails to the City Council and City Clerk.  citycouncil@costamesaca.gov

CITYCLERK@costamesaca.gov

Tonight's Agenda: 

CITY OF COSTA MESA (costamesaca.gov)

April 12 Vote on Giant LED Signs at Triangle Square

 (1) SpeakUp! Costa Mesa – Wendy Leece and Co. - YouTube

TIME TO LOBBY PUBLIC OFFICIALS RE: TRIANGLE SQUARE

We have a voice! And now is the time to shout!

Time is short!  April 12 is the planning commission public hearing to approve giant LED signs for Triangle Square.  Everyone I talk to is against this idea mainly for safety reasons and aesthetics.  More than  756 people have signed the online petition to voice their NO opinion.  It's a bad idea.  

If you care about the future of Costa Mesa, its image and its safety, now is the time to speak up or forever, and I mean, forever, hold your peace.  If approved, the agreement will give the owner renewable rights to advertise anything sold in Costa Mesa for years. 

With City Hall closed, we can't attend meetings and let officials see our faces of distress over this project. Letting our public officials hear our voice through emails and Zoom calls is not effective. We the People are greatly handicapped in voicing our opposition.

If we really want officials to listen to us, we need to pick up our phones, call planning commissioners and have a chat.

Or, meet for coffee. 

In other words, we need to step up our game if we don't want this to happen.

What you did previously doesn't matter.  

If you sent an email, signed the petition or spoke at a Zoom meeting, you need to do SOMETHING again well before the April 12 meeting so the planning commissioners will have time to return your call or read your email.

And you need to save Monday, April 12 at 6 pm to speak during the meeting.

Be prepared--the April 12 meeting may last A LONG TIME.  We may get tired.  But we can't quit now! 

We MUST send a strong message, our united voices, that we don't want these giant billboards, which forever change the character of Costa Mesa.  Long after we've gone, people will say, "how could they approve  these signs?"

Some of us may go to City Hall and call into the Zoom meeting from  outside the Council chambers.  

Of course we care about suffering businesses, but it is not our job, We the People of Costa Mesa, who elect our officials and those they appoint, to rescue a failing business venture.  

Our job is to speak up and let officials hear our united voice. It's time!

714-754-5165:  Leave a message for planning commissioners to return your call. Officials work for us!

Email info:

Commissioners and Staff | City of Costa Mesa (costamesaca.gov)

CC: the City Council as the giant billboard project may go to the Council

citycouncil@costamesaca.gov  constituentservices@costamesaca.gov

And cc City Clerk:  brenda.green@costamesaca.gov

More info: https://www.change.org/p/residents-of-the-city-of-costa-mesa-say-no-to-3-digital-signs-from-sunrise-to-2-am-at-triangle-square?fbclid=IwAR0OPG6nc5bQpLlsq1xIkG75SPPFPVo-5oqCRgESlPr573F8QKa8ZCPVK7c

HAZARD PAY, ARTS & CULTURE & MAYOR

Here is the agenda for tonight's City Council Meeting:  CITY OF COSTA MESA (costamesaca.gov)

My comments:

Honorable Mayor and City Council:

Re: New Business 4-- Hazard Pay:

I urge you to please reconsider your position to force businesses to award “Hazard Pay” to grocery workers.

It is not the responsibility of government to interfere in the marketplace, even in a pandemic.

By voting to approve this pay and force grocery stores to pay employees $4 per hour you are setting a dangerous precedent.

In America we enjoy free markets, not subject to government intervention.  Regardless of claims of excessive profits, it is not for the government to decide to order raises.

Will you ask the owner of Amazon and Home Depot to do the same?  What is next?

By intruding into the workplace, intervening in a private employee-employer relationship, you as a city council are venturing into an area where you have no jurisdiction.

It is not the government’s role to impose “economic justice” to a certain class of employees, even if they are frontline workers.

All workers have freedom of choice and may decide to work or not to work at a business, depending on risks. That’s the American way.

Some workers belong to a union.  It has been the historic role of unions in America to advocate for workers’ rights and protections.  Let the unions advocate for their employees.

A Costa Mesa car repair owner, John Munteen, wrote a book called “Willing to Die” about why he left the tyrannical communist government in Romania.  He passed away last year and his son now runs the business. Many like Mr. Munteen fled communist countries to come to America---for freedom.

Let’s not go down this path. This idea has consequences and is a bad idea. It’s over-reach by government.

Re: NB 5--Mayor Selection

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council,

As a member of FIPAC I am keenly aware of the City’s financial challenges and the expense of a special election in 2021.

After much thought my recommendation is for Mayor Pro Tem Marr to become Mayor and for the city council to receive applications for a new city council member.

Please consider what the City of Irvine did when Mayor of Irvine Don Wagner was voted to the Board of Supervisors.  Christina Shea, as mayor pro tem, became mayor and (I believe) applications were received and Mike Carroll was selected to be on the City Council.

This plan would be in the best interest of the City because the MPT has a real time knowledge of current city affairs and it will be a smoother transition to become mayor and better for the city.  And after reviewing applications, the Council can decide on the best qualified for a new council member.  I don’t think it matters if the council member is at-large or from the current Mayor Pro Tem’s council district.

Re: NB 2-Arts & Culture Plan

The Arts and Culture Plan is outstanding! So many wonderful ideas.  All the time an energy by all the people involved is appreciated!

However, we are in the midst of a pandemic with many financial challenges.

I would ask that all proposed budget items for the Plan be carefully reviewed by the FIPAC which can make recommendations based on the City’s current and future financial status.

 

 

Giant LED Billboard Vote @TS Delayed to April 12

                   

          Contact Our Costa Mesa Officials-info below

         Distracted Driving Awareness Month is April

                           No Coincidence!

                              

A recent Giant Billboard Proposal lowers Giant Billboard by 5 feet and may be more distracting

                                     Current View from 1901 Newport

One never-ending nightmare. That's what a grassroots effort opposing giant LED billboards at Triangle Square feels like. 

Eleven years ago residents rallied to oppose a very bad idea to put just one LED sign at 19th and Newport. 

Residents prevailed and the owner pulled the proposal. Unfortunately, the son of that project reared its ugly head a year ago with a new TS owner proposing THREE GIANT LED SIGNS at the 3 TS intersections. The reason? The signs alone would revitalize and bring customers to the ailing center.

 

Mercy! How to fight this unsafe, ugly idea during COVID? We can't march to City Hall and speak in person at planning commission meetings, which have been continued numerous times. Even if the PC nixes the idea, due to a Development Agreement, the City Council must still hold a public hearing and vote. 

A small team organized in 2020, met on Zoom, and started speaking during planning commission Zoom meetings and lobbying planning commissioners.

We created a Change.org petition with more than 753 signers saying "No" we, the residents of Costa Mesa don't want these signs. Petition · Residents of the City of Costa Mesa: Say "NO" to 3 Digital Signs from Sunrise to 2 AM at Triangle Square · Change.org

We are not Las Vegas or Times Square. We let commissioners know over and over during public comments that "no way, no how" would this plan fly with many Costa Mesans. We made flyers and encouraged Costa Mesans to call and send emails.

Safety and aesthetics are the main concerns. It's utterly insane to think that drivers at these 3 busy intersections, 19th and Newport, Harbor at 19th and Newport at Harbor,  won't be distracted by the flashing signs.  People are ignoring the fact that where the 55 ends at 19th is one of the busiest intersections in OC.

                                   Harbor at Newport Blvd from Courtyards

Also, we've very concerned about  Third Party advertising which means the owner could advertise ANYTHING sold in Costa Mesa. Use your imagination. The sky is the limit.  Pardon the pun!

We've given planning commissioners and City planning staff evidence that current data proves the signs would be a dangerous distraction. 

For reasons unknown to us, the owner asked for a continuance to April 12 for the Planning Commission public hearing which the Commission approved this week. 

There is no real financial benefit for the City when compared with the risk of loss of life and property and cost for police and paramedics to attend to the accidents. More headaches with more accidents, and risks to drivers, walkers and bike riders. 

Data clearly shows this kind of advertising is not effective and poses risks to life and property.   How can the California Department of Transportation approve such an idea? Boggles the mind!

Are we utterly insane to think that a Development Agreement giving the City 25 percent of the advertising revenue,  due after the first three years, is a good deal? Who is negotiating on behalf of the residents? It is a BAD plan. What if TS goes BK? What happens with a new owner?

Does the owner really think these giant billboards will rescue TS from bankruptcy? The 30-year-old owner has given us, the residents, the taxpayers, a "pig in a poke". 

                                             19th and Harbor

Any pretense of an outreach to residents whose opposition was not heard, was a joke. Those closest to TS on 19th and Fullerton, did not receive invitations.

After nearly a year, why do we continue to oppose this idea?  Because it stinks to high Heaven and does not compliment our City's quiet, small town image.

                           

How does Mayor Foley's  recent election to the BOS affect this project? I'll have to write about that later.

PLEASE TAKE ACTION!  And SHARE!

APRIL---Distracted Driving Awareness Month – April 2021

·        Please take a few minutes to contact the officials below and even if you have already sent an email, please “refresh” the planning commissioners about your opposition with a new email.  They might not remember the one you sent a year ago. Copy and paste this link and it will take you to the individual PC emails. Commissioners and Staff | City of Costa Mesa (costamesaca.gov)  

·        Calling and leaving a message and asking a commissioner to call you is also amazingly effective. Remember, these appointed officials serve us.  Have a chat with them to tell them you oppose the billboards! 714-754-5165

·        Copying the City Council on your email is also effective to give the City Council a head’s up on your opposition. citycouncil@costamesaca.gov.  https://www.costamesaca.gov/city-hall/city-council/council-contact-information

 T      City Council's Constituent Services Team, please call (714) 754-5105 or email constituentservices@costamesaca.gov.

C      City clerk to make sure your comment is in the public record https://www.costamesaca.gov/city-hall/city-departments/city-clerk    

Hazard Pay for Grocery Workers is A Bad Idea

Sometimes it feels like we are living in the Twilight Zone. On Tuesday, the Costa Mesa City Council voted 6-1 to direct City staff to write a new ordinance forcing about 12 local grocery stores to give employees “hazard” pay. The vote was 6-1 with Council Member Don Harper voting “no”. Thank you, Council Member Harper, for showing common sense and representing many of us who think this is an absurd idea. Mandating a $4 an hour raise, Council Members reasoned grocery workers were being underpaid and at a greater risk of catching COVID while the corporations they worked for were raking in the dough. There was no data given to support this accusation. What happened to the old-fashioned idea that union bosses are supposed to represent employees and negotiate raises? The City has no jurisdiction to tell local businesses to offer “hazard” pay. The City is exposing taxpayers to lawsuits. Everyone has a personal responsibility to protect themselves from COVID-19 and other diseases. All workers may stop working and collect unemployment benefits if the risk is too great at work. Or workers may find another job. Trader Joe’s recently increased its “thank you” pay by $2 hour in addition to an earlier $2 raise and expanded health benefits. It is up to the employer to reward employees. Mine did with a generous debit card. There are many heroes in COVID. We cannot go down this path to recognize one group. Where does it end? This dangerous idea is the tip of the spear toward more government control by somehow equating “hazard” pay with “economic justice”. This idea is anathema to the American free enterprise system and creeps us toward socialism. We elected the Mayor and City Council to work for Costa Mesans. I helped elect some of these council members because I believed they would vote for what is best for Costa Mesa. This ordinance is government over-reach. The ordinance will come back to the Council for a vote at a future meeting. Please let the City Council hear from you. The Council must focus on ways to save money at City Hall and ways to bring in more businesses to Costa Mesa. Let private businesses decide what employees should earn. That is the American way.

Council Should Say No to Hero Pay

Should a city council vote to force grocery store owners to give grocery works $4 per hour Hero Pay? I do not think so, but at tonight's (March 2, 2021) Costa Mesa City Council meeting, the Council will consider doing such an over-reach into private businesses. I am asking the Council to please reject this idea and vote to receive and file NB 3. The City has no jurisdiction to direct local businesses to offer Hero Pay. As the report mentions, there are several downsides, such as grocery stores closing and lawsuits. We elected the Mayor and City Council to work for Costa Mesans. How many grocery workers live in Costa Mesa? The report does not say. Grocery workers have unions to help them negotiate raises and Hero Pay. Grocery workers have a personal responsibility to protect themselves from COVID-19 and other diseases. They may stop working and collect unemployment benefits. It is not the job of local government to issue such an edict that affects a business’ employees and its bottom line. In the staff report, there is no data to support grocery workers’ disparity in pay in the marketplace. The argument to order a $4 Hero Pay is not justified. Next, will the Council be supporting nurses to receive Hero Pay? Or tell CVS, Home Depot, or other “essential” businesses to support Hero Pay? Where does it end? The Council must not wade into this unchartered territory but focus on ways to save money at City Hall and ways to bring in more businesses to Costa Mesa. They need to stay out of local business operations and what the owners pay their employees. It is none of their business. Let the free market decide.

Honoring all those who fought for freedom.

To Dwell Safely in Costa Mesa

The City Council held an all day Goal-Setting Day and Council Retreat on January 25, 2019. The comments which follow, somewhat amended, are those I spoke at Public Comments at the start of the meeting. For many of us the last 12 years have been difficult in Costa Mesa. Our voices representing ourselves and our neighbors, who also wanted our City Council to keep Costa Mesa a safe, clean city, seemed to be ignored in favor of a Council majority which kowtowed to the whims of developers. Now thankfully you have an opportunity to collaborate and restore those areas of our City which were not priorities and have need of attention. A lot of important things fell through the cracks. There’s a lot that needs to be fixed and there are new ideas. When you look at all the areas that need attention and the new ideas you want to implement, I ask you to please filter those projects through the lenses of your residents’ safety. How does this affect residents’ safety and quality of life? Our police protection and emergency services? Our quiet neighborhoods? We have the good life here where we enjoy many amenities and where we can raise our kids and grandkids in a caring, diverse community. We can even grow old here. But we want to be safe and know when we call 911 someone will answer and help us in a timely manner. We expect our streets to be clean and free from litter. I was here in the 70’s and the 80’s rearing my little flock in our Westside home off of Victoria. We had community policing. There was a very good sense of safety. I mean, we felt safe. There is not that same feeling of being safe in our homes and on our streets or today. I know you are all up to the challenge of find answers to making us a safe and clean city again. In closing there was one Bible verse, probably my favorite, that I referred to often, when praying for Costa Mesa during the years of turmoil. It’s Jeremiah 33:3: “Call to me, and I will answer you and show you great and mighty things which you do not know.” I believe God answered this prayer by giving us this City Council. God tells Jeremiah that He will bring healing to the city, meaning Jerusalem. But I think we can apply this concept of prayer and God’s answers to our lives today. When we pray and ask God for help, He will answer. He will bring favor, goodness, peace, joy, health and the people will “dwell safely.” And that continues to be my prayer for you today. That our leaders will work together to make the right decisions to enable us to dwell safely in Costa Mesa. Wendy Leece

12 Years of Turmoil. Do We Want More?

Have we had enough? Do you have potholes?  Are your streets and gutters swept clean regularly?  Are there thefts in your neighborhood?  Afraid to go to the neighborhood park? Do the police come right away when you call? We didn’t have these problems in the 70s, the 80s or the 90s. The problems started in 2007, which unfortunately was the year I began my first term on the city council. That was the year Jim Righeimer was appointed to the planning commission by Allan Mansoor who was mayor. Righeimer carpetbagged over to Costa Mesa from Fountain Valley. He’d never been engaged in Costa Mesa, yet he got appointed. And the turmoil began. 12 years. The reason we have so many things to fix is because our priorities for 12 LONG YEARS have been wrong. Instead of fixing things, we’ve been fighting things--two charters, a for-profit baseball field at Tewinkle Park, small lot ordinance, overlays on Harbor and Newport Boulevard, the effects of sober living and homeless persons, and saving Fairview Park from being turned into a sports field. Big dense projects. Traffic. Putting our quality of life here at great risk. The priorities of the council majority of Righeimer, Monahan and Mensinger were not the priorities of the People of Costa Mesa but were the priorities of a developer-friendly city council majority and planning commission. So now the question is, do we want to bring back the good ole boys with their out-of-town developer buddies and anti-public employee agenda? Look at the 3-story stack-a-shacks on 17th between Superior and Pomona if you must think about your answer. I hope your answer is a resounding NO! Never, ever. Not in a million years! I have lived in Costa Mesa’s Westside for 46 years and raised 5 kids here. I want those who come after me to enjoy the same experience I’ve enjoyed in a safe, clean Costa Mesa with good public and private schools where families can raise kids to be good citizens. Our City’s charm, character and citizens make for a good life in Costa Mesa. Which is all at risk with this election on Nov. 6. SO, who will fill those empty seats? Empty seats? We must vote for Katrina Foley for mayor AND Arlis Reynolds for District 5 or there will be 2 vacant seats open to be appointed by the new council to finish the two-year terms for the at-large council members (Genis and Mansoor) if they are elected. (I’d vote for Manuel Chavez in district 4 and Andrea Marr in district 3 if I could.) And it’s quite possible, but God forbid, people friendly to developers would be appointed, if the PEOPLE of Costa Mesa, do not have a majority on the city council. What do we want, more turmoil, or peace? I vote for peace. 12 years of turmoil is enough. I’m tired.

Our Reality: Living with Sober Living Homes in Costa Mesa

If you see something, SAY SOMETHING

It Takes a Village

United We Stand

Knowledge is Power

Never Give in, Never, Never, Never, (1941 Churchill)

Thank God for the Register’s OC Watchdog series (http://www.ocregister.com/tag/oc-watchdog/ ) exposing the sober living industry which invaded our quaint Costa Mesa a few years ago.  

The article may be the answer some of us have been waiting for to inform Costa Mesans about the complexities of the sober living home industry. A few years ago, a few brave residents united to try to oppose the takeover of once safe and quiet neighborhoods. However, to silence their free speech, residents received cease and desist letters warning them they could be sued if their actions showed discrimination towards the rehabilitation clients. Residents were hushed.  Who could risk a lawsuit and losing their home?

The City hemmed and hawed, doing nothing, citing possible lawsuits if there was discrimination towards clients, but in 2014 an ordinance was passed.  It was never strongly enforced. For several years only one code enforcement officer handled any citizen complaints about nuisance behavior or building code violations or lack of required permits from the sober living homes.

Now residents should be interested in reading through an update to the ordinance passed recently by the city council and taking effect June 2. Reading it and printing for future reference, residents will be able to understand better how the City, in context of ADA nondiscrimination laws, is trying to regulate and require permitting of sober living homes: http://www.costamesaca.gov/ftp/council/a...

There is a key paragraph on Page 8, if you don't want to read the whole ordinance: v. “The sober living home shall have a good neighbor policy that shall direct occupants to be considerate of neighbors, including refraining from engaging in excessively loud, profane or obnoxious behavior that would unduly interfere with a neighbor's use and enjoyment of their dwelling unit. The good neighbor policy shall establish a written protocol for the house manager/operator to follow when a neighbor complaint is received.”

Beginning on Page 5 are requirements for a City permit. Key point:  If a resident has a problem with a sober living home, the resident should contact the city to see if the operation is permitted or if it is a State licensed home.   

It is hoped all operators would apply for permits and follow all rules, but that is part of the challenge, many homes are unknown to the city.

“Curbing” has been the biggest problem in the last few years.  Clients are kicked “to the curb” when they “fall off the wagon,” or break other rules. Many of the clients are young people who came to Costa Mesa to get sober from places all over America. Getting them home isn’t easy. Many wander our streets, black trash bag or backpack hanging over their back.

Note on Page 6 of the Ordinance are the NEW requirements for eviction. "(6) At least 48 hours prior to eviction from or involuntary termination of residency in a group home, the operator thereof shall: i. notify the person designated as the occupant’s emergency contact or contact of record that the occupant is no longer a resident at the home; ii. contact the Orange County Health Care Agency OC Links Referral Line or other entity designated by the City to determine the services available to the occupant, including but not limited to, alcohol and drug inpatient and outpatient treatment; iii. notify the city’s Network for Homeless Solutions that an occupant is no longer a resident at the home, determine the services available therefrom; and iv. provide the information obtained from ii. and iii. and any other treatment provider or service to the occupant prior to his or her release on a form provided by the city and obtain the occupant’s signed acknowledgement thereon; v. provided, however, that if the occupant’s behavior results in immediate termination of residency pursuant to rules approved by the city as part of the special use permit for that facility, the operator shall comply with i. though iv. as soon as possible".

Just how many operators know about these new rules is anyone's guess. I’m not sure how the City plans to hold operators accountable since many homes are not registered.  

But with these rules residents are now empowered to report violations through Costa Mesa Connect, the Code Enforcement Department and the police department.

Should a certain address accumulate many reports of rules’ violations in addition to other types of nuisance behavior, it is possible the City could declare the property a nuisance.

Knowledge is power and City ordinances and reports are not always easy to understand, but I wanted to share this ordinance highlighting important parts hoping that neighbors will meet with their neighbors and work together to develop their own strategies to defend and protect their families, property and quality of life.

I love this quote from Winston Churchill: “I am addressing myself to the School - surely from this period of ten months this is the lesson: never give in, never give in, never, never, never, never-in nothing, great or small, large or petty - never give in except to convictions of honour and good sense. Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy. We stood all alone a year ago, and to many countries it seemed that our account was closed, we were finished. All this tradition of ours, our songs, our School history, this part of the history of this country, were gone and finished and liquidated.”

Costa Mesans are courageous and strong folk who love our city and the life we enjoy here. I've raised 5 kids here and hope to die here.  We can’t give up. We must do all we can to defend and protect our families, homes and our quality of life.

(For the entire speech see: https://www.nationalchurchillmuseum.org/never-give-in-never-never-never.html) 
Looking forward to the new movie "Churchill".

It's Our Money

It’s city budget time!

The City Council will vote June 20 to approve the All Funds $155 million 2017-2018 budget, so if you have any concerns about how our money should be spent, now is the time to make your concerns known.  A special budget session for residents will be held Thursday, April 18 at City Hall.  https://www.costamesaca.gov/index.aspx?page=28&recordid=4173. The link will lead you to the proposed budget as well, and there are copies in the libraries and in the City Clerk’s office.

Also on June 6 residents have an opportunity to speak for 3 minutes at public comments at the Council meeting.

But please be aware, if you are old, maybe a LTR (Long Time Resident) Council member Righeimer might chastise you from the dais for your comments for the sole reason that you are old, your house is paid for and you are out of step with the times and trends of younger folks. In his opinion your old opinions really don’t matter in Costa Mesa anymore. 

During public comments at Tuesday’s City Council meeting, I voiced my concerns about the proposed budget which includes the Lions Park Library Project.  

My main concern is borrowing money, even $18 million, which may not be the wisest decision.  Many sources point to another recession coming our way. We should also be building up our reserves beyond $45 million and replenish our self-insurance fund. And the coming tsunami is the increase in employee pensions in the next few years, projected to be $7 million on top of the $22 million we’re paying now. These concerns can’t be ignored and I often take advantage of public comments to exercise my First Amendment right of free speech to share those concerns, as a taxpayer, with the Council. 

Also, some of us really don’t like the proposed library design because it’s too massive; the 2 story white building looks out of place in Lions Park.

Losing many meeting rooms at the community center is another issue, although eventually the old library will be reconstructed and have meeting rooms, and the new library will have meeting rooms too. 

Cost of additional library staffing has not been discussed by the Council, as well as how the proposed library coffee shop will affect the local businesses on Newport Blvd. and at the Courtyards.  

It’s wrong for Council member Righeimer member to demean any citizen for voicing any concerns. The Council member should just listen politely.

My recommendation for a new library has always been for the library groups to raise some of the money from private donors, who may want to sponsor a whole wing, or room, to access library grants and for the City to save the money and not acquire debt.  

The difficulties of our City during the recession taught me many lessons about thrift and living within our means and having reserves. Thankfully we made it without going bankrupt because we did have plenty of reserve funds. 

All this is to say that community involvement makes for a better community.  Even if elected officials don’t agree with you, and think you are too old and should just be quiet, we should never be intimidated because it’s our duty to speak up about important city issues.   We're not dead yet and the collective wisdom of our years should be valued.

Puttering, SOY and Politics

I was contemplating puttering yesterday, because working in my garden is very refreshing especially on Sunday

My garden and pond

when I try to rest. I was hopeful the Fairview Park Preservation Initiative would get the 7,000 signatures by today which meant I could relax, for a few minutes anyway.  (Yes! we got the signatures, exceeding our goal of 7,000, to get the initiative on the November ballot assuming it's approved by the registrar of voters).

But I kept thinking about Friday night's joyful Save our Youth annual Fiesta honoring founder and board member Jean Forbath and wanted to share a few thoughts.

The whole event was delightful and speaks volumes about how much we care for our community and our kids who need help with school work and a vision from a tutor or mentor who encourage them to succeed in school and to prepare for college after graduation.

Money raised from the Fiesta goes for a small SOY staff, headquarters, art and music supplies etc. and scholarships and trips for kids to visit colleges and many other things. More than $3.2 million in college scholarships to more than 450 students has been given to attend all UC campuses and almost every Cal State.

"SOY academic students have a 100% high school graduation rate and  100 % enter college after high school"- SOY brochure.

I admire Jean Forbath for her vision and commitment to help Newport-Mesa disadvantaged youth since 1993. Jean founded SOS too. She's got a lot of gems in her crown and still contributing to our community, although now will be retiring and continue as board emeritus and advisor.

Upon arriving at the Fiesta, Silvia Rosales and SOY youth welcomed guests, Eddie Iniestra MC'd with live music courtesy of SOY students, as we browsed the silent auction (I didn't win), and Ivan Calderon of Taco Mesa served a scrumptious meal.  Former Mayor Joe Erickson shared Jean's many accomplishments and we all clapped.

A  very well-spoken young lady, Claudia Flores, shared her story about how SOY mentors helped her with studies and prepared her for college. She and other SOY college graduates come back to SOY to encourage the younger kids.  When the kids visit colleges in the spring, former SOY students proudly give them campus tours.

Fiesta guests were from Newport Beach and Costa Mesa. (About half of Newport Harbor High School kids live in Costa Mesa, board member Mary Cappellini reminded me as we chatted during the silent auction. Mary is one of Jean's 7 children who were all there to honor their mom).

Former Mayor Joe Erickson honoring Jean Forbath.

Ivan Calderon explaining the delicious menu.

Chatting with board member Mary Cappellini.

This joyful event speaks well of our great Newport-Mesa community and the generous, kind caring people we are.

Councilwoman Sandy Genis was there as well as former Mayor Mary Hornbuckle. Sandy and I chatted with others about our wonderful community and the success of SOY.

But where were the Costa Mesa mayor and the mayor pro tem? I know they get invited to plenty of events but I think they would enjoy this one too. Don't they know this is an important community event supporting one of several Westside non profits which encourages, and inspires hundreds of kids to get a good education?   Surely they were invited. But then I don't think Mayor pro tem Righeimer's recent "...If you can't afford to live here..."  statement at a recent council meeting would have made him too popular with SOY Fiesta goers.  According to Mr. Righeimer Costa Mesa has become an exclusive, wealthy community so poor people should consider moving to less expensive states. Unbelievable!

Hopefully, anyone who missed the Fiesta will send in a donation. We need to continue to support SOY and Newport- Mesa teens and all the good work they do for Newport-Mesa kids.

Here's the address:  SOY Center, 661 Hamilton Street, Costa Mesa, CA 92627  949-548-3255. Soycenter@aol.com

My 2016 Prayer/Hope/Wish List

Everyone is writing lists, so here's mine for Costa Mesa:

1. That the City Council would offer hiring bonuses for police officers wanting to make "lateral" transfers from other police departments to CMPD.   Mr. Hatch's $1 million (slush) fund could fund 20 officers @$10-$15K.  ($200,000-$300,000) This is a reasonable expense for our safety and to replace the "depth" the CMPD has lost through retirements, etc. We need a fully staffed police force with 134 officers when crime is increasing.  

2. That the mayor and mayor pro tem would drop the lawsuit and get on with the business of governing our city, not running it into the ground due  to  hatred of unions.

3. That within the next 90 days, the council would complete negotiations with our fire and police associations and sign contracts that "retain and recruit" the best public safety officers for our residents.

4. That the City would be proactive in its efforts to transition the Costa Mesa Motor Inn residents to their new homes and new lives and make sure all residents who need help are in fact, helped. (Similar to the way our city staff helped the residents from Anchor Mobile Home Park find new homes.)

5. That future apartment projects include units for those who need affordable housing because it's the right thing to do.

6. That the Council would pursue all leads to provide supportive housing to Costa Mesa homeless persons, including use of Fairview State Hospital.

7. That sober living home operators would incorporate a "best practices exit strategy" for all of their clients leaving rehab, and not dump these clients on our streets where some, not having maintained their sobriety, proceed to commit crimes in our neighborhoods. This is not being a good neighbor.  Also, that sober living operators require clients to do "community service" projects.  I'd like to see clients give back some sweat equity to our city and be openly appreciative of the gift it is to live here: scrape up gum, pick up trash, cigarette butts. Sober living recovery homes imbedded in neighborhoods were intended to promote healthy community living, not isolation.

8. That in 2016 Costa Mesa citizens would take the time to become informed about the many issues affecting our city's future such as the proposed changes to the General Plan on Harbor and Newport Blvds that will forever increase traffic. That citizens would ask questions and seek out the answers and be fully informed when voting in November.

9. That voters support the Costa Mesa First Initiative (http://www.costamesa1st.com) in November and sign petitions and vote for the recently launched initiative to preserve Fairview Park. (http://www.fairviewparkalliance.org) Both initiatives will give residents a voice in future city developments and uses of the park.

10. That the council follow the informed recommendations of its Pension Committee and request staff research and report on:  retiree medical, pension trusts, revenue/borrowing pre pay options, hybrid defined benefit and defined contribution plans, plans with employer and employee sharing basics costs 50 50, and also allowing employees freedom to contribute additional amounts. Paying down the Fireside Fund is goal too. Here is the complete report: http://www.costamesaca.gov/modules/showdocument.aspx?documentid=20327

11. And finally, should there be vacancies on any committees that the council would vote for the most qualified persons.

Encouraging Responses to my motel visit

I shouldn't be surprised by getting positive feedback from the piece I wrote about my visit to the Costa Mesa Motor Inn. It confirms that we Costa Mesans, in spite of other differences in opinions, are collectively compassionate, caring and eager to show mercy to our neighbors if given the chance to do something tangible.

I have been burdened by the real life, hard luck stories I heard from the CMMI residents.

Of course many of us knew this day was coming for those who live in motels, mobile homes and other affordable housing in Costa Mesa. Many of us have copies of the City's  "M" map showing our motels and mobile home parks with colored dots as targets for redevelopment.  For awhile, the planning department gave out those maps to developers who could zero in on those parcels when looking for prime real estate deals in Costa Mesa knowing our developer friendly council would help with the details.

But it's almost Christmas,  so let's put aside the politics for a moment.  Is there anything we can do to ease the plight of some of our neighbors? We can't help hundreds in need, but maybe we can stop and help one, or two.

Yes, we can act on those heart- felt impulses and reach out with some small act of kindness.

My friend Terri is collecting sleeping bags for the homeless. She emailed me today that the bag I gave her was placed on a woman sleeping and the woman almost cried when Terri placed it over her.

I'm going to buy a gift card for one CMMI family that touched my heart.

Maybe you're thinking of doing something too. Do it!

Let's not get overwhelmed and discouraged by the battles we've lost or the ones ahead.

Let's show our  Costa Mesa love and compassion and chase the demons right out of our city and pray they don't come back.

Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays.

Life Happens in Costa Mesa

Arriving Saturday morning at the infamous Costa Mesa Motor Inn on Harbor Blvd., I saw three little girls, about 7 or 8 years old, giggling and chasing each other near the golf course fence, behind the motel's entrance gate. I immediately recognized one little girl whose picture had been in the paper recently.

My heart was telling me Saturday to go with a handful of others to pass out flyers to motel residents informing them of their legal rights.  Recently the city council voted to approve a zoning change and replace the motel with luxury apartments.  Those little girls and their parents live at the motel and will need to find a new home in 2016.  The flyers will help them with their futures.

This apartment project came before the city council in 2014 for a "screening" when I was still on the council. At the screening, I approved the new project's concept. The outdated motel had a bad reputation for crime and many police and fire calls.  However, at the time, I had asked the developer representing the owner to please include "affordable housing" to match the incomes of those residents being displaced, in the final project. Unfortunately, that request was denied. There will be some affordable housing in the new project, but the future residents would need to make approximately $75,000, perhaps more than $100,000 to be eligible for an apartment.  I wouldn't qualify. 

By passing out the flyers, I was in a very small way helping residents in their relocation plans from the motel to a new home.  I told them that if they have lived at the motel for more than 30 days, they were promised cash relocation assistance. The owner agreed to pay the benefits beginning in February 2016 through August 1, 2016.  In addition, Councilwoman Katrina Foley successfully negotiated with the owner for  $250,000 for the City staff to assist residents. Those details, I understand, are still being worked out.

As I spoke with some residents, I was told by several that the conditions of the motel had improved greatly since 2013. Gone were many drug dealers and the problems they brought. 

 I talked with parents, children by their sides, all concerned with their futures and how things would work out for them.  They welcomed the flyers which reminded them of some things they could do to prepare for their moves.  I listened to several stories of lives on the brink, a few steps away from homelessness. Fortunately, they were looking forward to church members bringing cheer and presents for a Christmas party for them.

This motel and its residents had been characterized many times by the council majority as a den of iniquity, filled with drugs, pimps and prostitutes needing immediate removal from our city.  But that is not what I saw.  I saw a very clean motel, (no trash), a nice playground and sparkling pool and normal looking people and kids. Many told me they were long time Costa Mesa residents wanting to stay in Costa Mesa.

I believe all lives matter, and some lives are not worth less than others. (I hated that "lifeboat" analogy we used to teach in the 70's).

 If we keep going in this direction in Costa Mesa, we might end up with more money in our budget because of more revenue from property taxes, but we will have lost our heart, our compassion, and that will be pretty hard to restore.  

It takes all kinds of people to make up a great city like ours.  We seem to be going down a road where we are squeezing out those on the bottom rungs of the economic ladder.  It wasn't too long ago that residents of the mobile home park Rolling Homes on Newport Blvd. almost lost their homes to a proposed apartment project until an adjacent property owner saved the day and said he wasn't going to sell his property to provide access to the new project. God intervened.

I'm praying for these folks at the motel.  They could use some miracles too.

I'm baaaack! Some crazy glitch in Blogger (or some nefarious plot to dismantle my ocpublicsquare square blog) prevents me from posting the normal way, but I have overcome all obstacles and I'm back in the blogging business.

ICYMI Fairview Park Preservation Alliance is now waiting until Oct 2 for the CM City attorney to approve the petition which would preserve the park "as built" in perpetuity and require any additions to follow the park's master plan. Those interested, watch for updates. We need to collect more than 5,000 valid Costa Mesa voter signatures. Check out and like Facebook page Fairview Park Preservation Alliance.

That's the same amount we need to collect for the Costa Mesa First initiative to put a stop on out of control development adding more density and traffic to our already busy streets. Check out Facebook and website www.costamesa1st.Com for details and how you can help gather signatures.

It's a busy season for us normal Costa Mesans who want our voices to be heard by the City Council.

Next up: homeless issues and sober living: how are they related?  (No visible relapse plan for those who fall off the wagon onto our streets and parks and remaining bus benches).

Why?

Why?
Why do we do it? Why do we skip dinner, put on our thinking caps after a long day and go to a city council meeting? Why don't we just stay home? Why do we sit there and pore over staff reports, scribble out what we hope makes sense, turn a card in so we can speak, and then stay past midnight to put in our 2 cents about Fairview Park? Why?

Because, we care. We love this city. We care about Hank Lloyd and his great tennis program which for Costa Mesans is affordable and convenient.  We care about the City Council budget and the reserve fund.  We want the Council to put more than $500,000 towards the unfunded pension liability. We don't want to see our city, blessed with probably the biggest shopping center in the world, go bankrupt.

We love this city and are prepared to do whatever it takes to get it back into the hands of people who really care about people and are not just interested in reimaging out city from one end to the other and changing the rules so developers can make more money and then give some of it to the politicians who helped them.

We've never  been in this place before.  We stopped TWO dumb charters, stopped Big League Dreams, elected Sandy and Katrina, but our backs are still against the wall without a majority. 

But last night's council meeting was a doosy! We actually beat back the sports fields because people got up and told the council we don't want no stinkin sports fields at Fairview or some crazy survey that is skewed to tell the Council Costa Mesans want sports fields.  (No data has EVER been produced by the recreation department to prove we NEED more sports fields or lighted sports fields).

Earlier, we watched as Gary divulged confidential information about the CMPOA---totally breaking the Brown Act by stating the POA turned down an offer.  Tom Duarte's  answer was so wishy washy. Katrina did an awesome job of calling him out.

So if you are reading this and thinking you don't need to pay attention to what is going on at city hall, I have to tell you that you are wrong.  We need more people who love this city and are willing to sacrifice a few comforts to continue to confront the City Council on issues that impact the future of our City. 

In a few minutes I'm off to College Park School to a forum on sober living homes put on by College Park residents who are enraged that a neighbor's home was broken into by someone who lives in a nearby sober living home.  The kids were asleep and the dad got up and chased him out!  He was arrested later, thank God. How has the sober living home market been allowed to saturate our city? Why don't we have enough police to patrol our neighborhoods?

It may be everything is just fine on your street, but with police staffing down below 100, and plan underway to close Fire Station 6 up by South Coast Plaza, it's only a matter of time before you realize you need to come down to City Hall and make your voices heard to the City Council too.  It's not too late.  Those of us who go don't want our city to be just a memory.  We want to preserve it for the future so that others can enjoy the blessings and quality of life we have enjoyed.

Time to Return to the Blogosphere

With so much free time on my hands, I've come back to revive my blog. First, thank you very much to everyone for the many very kind words as I termed out on Tuesday. I'm very humbled and blessed by the comments, presentations, my own "Costa Mesa book", a tennis racket from Hank Lloyd and more. Like I said, it felt like I was at a "funeral/graduation" from city council after 8 years-- a send off I never imagined.
Did I work hard? Yes. (I won't say I worked my butt off because all those free meals made me gain weight). But I did my best to serve and speak for the residents, and now as an ex council person, I intend to keep serving where I see the need. Stay tuned for updates.

I was teaching at juvenile hall today and remarked to another teacher that we only have one gang officer or less in Costa Mesa. Our police department keeps shrinking. We've lost the depth we were so proud of a few years ago. In the last 20 years we made the City safer, especially Shalimar, because we had 4 to 6 gang officers who kept tabs on the homies and home girls. Just one result of an unfortunate decision by the mayor and mayor pro tem to sue our police association, which really means they are suing the police department. To me it seems like a type of class action suit which only harms the residents of Costa Mesa. It will have to play out in court but in the meantime  our department struggles to serve residents with sworn staff of less than 100 officers. We have patrol officers who are stretched to the max and not enough detectives, investigators, traffic cops and special enforcement officers,
for things like prostitution and trafficking, to serve a city of our size.